PRU13 : Video Anwar Ibrahim Bersumpah Di Hadapan Kaabah Nafi Meliwat Saiful Bukhari Tersebar

Pada April 2012,  setelah beberapa bulan keputusan Kes Liwat saya di Mahkamah Tinggi, saya telah diberi kesempatan oleh Allah SWT ke Tanah Suci menunaikan Umrah bersama Arwah nenek. Alhamdulillah, semasa disana, saya peroleh semula kekuatan dan ketenangan. Maklumlah, pada Januari 2012, selepas keputusan kes saya diputuskan, saya berasa amat lemah dan tertekan.

SENARAI PENUH CALON PARLIMEN PRU13

Beberapa hari sebelum saya pulang, selepas Zohor, saya melakukan tawaf sunat, Solat Taubat dan Istiharah, saya mohon pada Allah petunjuk mengapa saya dijemput lagi untuk ke Tanah Suci?, sedangkan saya baru sahaja menunaikan Haji bersama Arwah Nenek pada November 2010.

Selepas sahaja Solat Fardhu Zohor, hati saya begitu terpanggil untuk melepaskan segala luka dan perit didalam hati saya, dengan melafazkan sumpah di hadapan Baitullah. Saya pun terus ke Kawasan Multazam(Pintu Kaabah), lalu melafazkan dan merakamnya sendiri.
SAKSIKAN VIDEO DI SINI

PRU13 : Azlan tarik balik kenyataan 8 Mac, minta maaf kepada Saiful

Dalam perkembangan mengejutkan menjelang hari mengundi 5 Mei, Azlan Mohd Lazim hari ini meminta maaf kepada anaknya, Saiful Bukhari, yang mendakwa diliwat oleh Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim, kerana telah mendakwa dia telah dipergunakan oleh pihak tertentu, pada satu sidang media 8 Mac lalu.

Azlan berkata permohonan maaf itu dibuat atas kesedaran dan keterlanjuran beliau mengkhianati anaknya, bukannya kerana desakan mana-mana pihak berkepentingan politik.

“Kepada seluruh ahli keluarga saya terutamanya ibu saya, adik-beradik saya, keluarga arwah ibu Saiful dan lebih-lebih lagi anak saya yang telah saya khianati, Saiful Bukhari, saya ingin memohon ampun dan maaf yang tidak terhingga kerana tindakan saya telah membuat keputusan yang salah,” katanya kepada pemberita pada sidang media tergempar di sebuah hotel di sini, hari ini.

Beliau juga menarik balik permohonan maafnya kepada Ketua Umum PKR, Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim awal Mac lalu, yang menafikan kelakuan jenayah pemimpin itu terhadap anaknya.

Sebaliknya beliau mempertahankan pendirian semasa membuat sumpah laknat bahawa bekas Timbalan Perdana Menteri itu terlibat dalam kejadian liwat dan beliau mengakui ia bukan satu konspirasi politik untuk menjatuhkan pemimpin itu.

SENARAI PENUH CALON PARLIMEN PRU13

Dalam pada itu, Azlan juga menarik balik semua kenyataannya termasuk pada majlis ceramah di Pulau Pinang dan Sungai Petani, Kedah pada 23 dan 24 Mac lalu yang menyatakan anaknya dipergunakan oleh pihak tertentu.

“Salah seorangnya Khairil Anas Jusoh untuk memfitnah DSAI (Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim) dalam kes liwat 2008.

“Dengan kenyataan akhabr ini diharap dapat menyelesaikan kekeliruan yang timbul daripada kenyataan saya sebelum ini.

“Keutamaan serta tanggungjawab saya pada ketika ini adalah kembali kepada anak saya seperti sedia kala dan hidup dalam keadaan harmoni,” jelasnya.

Sementara itu, Azlan turut mengumumkan beliau keluar PKR berkuat kuasa serta-merta.

“Saya akan mengemukakan notis keluar parti (PKR) selepas ini, masuk keluar parti itu perkara biasa, ramai juga ahli parti pembangkang buat begitu.

“Sekarang saya rasa lega lepas keluar parti, dapat tidur lena kerana tindakan sebelum ini telah sulitkan keluarga,” katanya sambil menafikan keputusan keluar PKR itu disebabkan kekangan dalam parti itu.


Sumber – Sinar Harian

Letter From Yuktes Vijay (Peguam Kes Liwat ll Anwar Ibrahim)

I read with anger the news that Saiful’s dad has joined PKR. I knew from Day 1 that the party was devoid of any integrity but for it to stoop to this extent is just mind boggling. I was working with one of Anwar’s long-time lawyers during the whole course of Sodomy 2 and was involved in A-Z of the trial itself.
BACA ULASAN DALAM BAHASA MELAYU DI SINI.
When I say A-Z, it means from meeting the forensic and DNA experts to reviewing of the documents to finding case laws for his submissions. I was involved in everything. I do not wish to mention the name of the lawyer here as I revere him as my mentor and I do not wish to drag him into this frustration and anger pouring of mine.
Why Anwar never took the stand?
Anwar claimed that he was never offered a fair trial. The truth is he was never brave enough to take the stand. He was never going to withstand the questions that were about to be put forward to his now ally Datuk Yusof. If you Pakatanians have doubts, why not ask him these questions and get valid, acceptable and not logically challenging answers for it.
Why did Anwar personally and specifically request his Chief of Staff, Ibrahim Yaakob to send Saiful to the apartment carrying documents when there were other staff there;
How come Saiful was aware of the code to enter the apartment which was ‘Mokhtar’, the name of Anwar’s security chief and brother-in-law? ;
Video evidence that was sent to Gandhi Labs in New Delhi confirmed the presence of Saiful in the apartment, so how can Saiful’s presence in the apartment be refuted;
Why was Saiful afforded special treatment i.e. he was given his own room, privilege of following Anwar for overseas trips though he was a new staff;
Anwar’s current aide, Najwan Halimi had previously e-mailed Anwar and told him about Saiful’s apparent afflictions to BN. Why was the call not heeded by Anwar?
Fearing that Anwar will not be able to withstand the onslaught by the Prosecution, the defence team then decided to ask him not to take stand uder the pretext that he was not offered a fair trial. Anwar excelled in conning, deceiving and cheating the public by assuming a Mandela like persona. He is no Mandela, merely a good con artist.
Fund for the overseas experts
The surprising factor here is why no one has ever questioned the fees that were involved in paying the forensic experts, Dr Brian Macdonald and Dr David Wells. Contrary to what the general public have been made to believe, they were paid hefty sums to defend him. When they were here, they stayed in Shang-ri La Hotel for a number of days.
Where did the money to pay the hotels come from? Did Anwar pay from his own pocket? No, he does not even pay his lawyers. So, he had very rich Datuks funding him. I do know the name of the Datuk, but for the reasons known close to me I will not disclose the name.
The problem is if PKR can throw questions as to the wedding expenditure of the Prime Minister, why not question where the money to pay these experts came from? If a former convict and a mere Opposition Leader can have Datuks funding his legal expences, what is wrong in having Datuks funding the wedding of the PM’s daughter?
Saiful
I don’t know much about Saiful. The only thing I can say is that the reason he was denied justice is that the Investigating Officer, Jude Perreira, ignored the protocols told to him by Jabatan Kimia and decided to do his things his own way.
There were traces of Anwar’s DNA in his rectum. The only thing that stopped the judge from convicting Anwar was the “break in the chain of evidence”. I will write a full piece on this soon. This drama itself deserves a full piece write up.
In a nutshell, there was evidence of Anwar’s semen in Saiful’s rectum. However, due to a break in chain of evidence and the question mark over the integrity of the samples, the evidence was not used.
So the judge had no other way of corroborating Saiful’s evidence.
Conclusion for Part 1
Anwar is a consummate liar. He is using Saiful’s dad to play up his victim role in order to garner votes. We all know for a fact that since he got acquitted he has lost that bit of “charm” about him as he has nothing to yell about anymore. I really hope he sues me so that I can prove in Court what I have just mentioned.
Remember Anwar Ibrahim, I grew up adoring you. I know your modus operandi and I aspired to be you. Sue me please. Let the public watch Anwar vs Anwar clone (which is me) in action. And remember the e-mails, Astroboy? I have all of them saved. Come get me!